A month of reflection on your relationship
An original journaling suggestion, without a promise of improvement in 30 days.
Understanding the topic
A month is a convenient period for a few observations, not a scientifically established time for change. You can shorten, adapt or stop this exercise.
What the research says
Kernová and colleagues’ meta-analysis examined digital interventions for couples. Some structured programmes showed benefits; outcomes varied by programme and population.
Source for this section: Lívia Kernová, Júlia Halamová, Denis Deriglazov
Limits of these findings
This does not validate our plan. The website, questionnaires and prompts below were not studied. Results from supported programmes cannot simply be transferred to independent journaling.
An optional starting point
In week one, you could note what you want to explore. In week two, choose one topic to discuss if you both wish. In week three, revisit your expectations. At the end, note what became clearer and what remains unanswered. Progress scores and sharing private notes are optional, not requirements.
Key point
Takeaway
This is a reflection suggestion, not therapy or an intervention with established effectiveness.
Read further
Sources
Lívia Kernová, Júlia Halamová, Denis Deriglazov. Effectiveness of digital interventions on relationship satisfaction among couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychology, 2025.
Przegląd systematyczny i metaanaliza / systematic review and meta-analysis
DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-03444-y
Sources support the identified sections. Sample sentences and exercises are original suggestions, not validated interventions.
How we prepare content